Skip to content

Pattern vs. Process

Why It Matters

These generate radically different evaluation methods. Patterned principles require continuous redistribution to maintain the pattern. Process principles permit any resulting distribution if the process was legitimate. You can't apply both simultaneously without conflict.

The Key Move

When evaluating a distribution, ask: Am I evaluating the pattern (snapshot of who has what) or the process (history of how they got it)? If both matter, which takes priority when they conflict?

Classic Application

Tax policy. Patterned view: Does the resulting income distribution match our fairness criteria? Adjust via taxation. Process view: Were earnings legitimately acquired through voluntary exchange? Taxation to alter patterns violates process rights.

Surprising Application

Academic citation and credit. Patterned view: Does credit distribution match actual contribution? Should institutions correct for citation biases. Process view: Was proper attribution followed? Then resulting citation patterns are legitimate even if concentrated.

Failure Modes

  • Assuming patterned inequality proves process injustice (legitimate processes can generate inequalities)
  • Ignoring that unjust processes can accidentally produce "fair-looking" patterns
  • Treating any deviation from preferred pattern as requiring intervention
  • Defending unjust processes because they generated acceptable current patterns

Go Deeper

Nozick, "Anarchy, State, and Utopia" Chapter 7 on Wilt Chamberlain example; Rawls, "Justice as Fairness" on pure procedural justice.