Commander's Intent¶
Why It Matters¶
Plans fail on contact with reality. Detailed instructions become obsolete. Clear intent enables appropriate improvisation when the script runs out.
The Key Move¶
Separate the "what" (objective, end state) from the "how" (specific plan). Communicate both, but emphasize the "what." When the plan fails, subordinates who understand intent can adapt appropriately.
Classic Application¶
"Mission-type orders" (Auftragstaktik). German military doctrine. Commanders specify objective and constraints, subordinates determine method. Enables adaptation speed that detailed orders can't match.
Surprising Application¶
Delegation in organizations. "Achieve 20% revenue growth" (intent) vs "execute these 47 specific initiatives" (plan). When circumstances change, the first enables adaptation; the second becomes obsolete or constraining.
Failure Modes¶
- Intent so vague it provides no guidance
- Intent without sufficient capability (can't achieve it regardless)
- Subordinates lack judgment to interpret intent correctly
- Culture punishes initiative (intent is nominal, obedience is real)
Go Deeper¶
German Auftragstaktik doctrine. Army leadership manuals on commander's intent.
Related Tools¶
- Initiative - Military Strategy & Strategic Thinking: A Map of the Territory